Back From the Brink: A Family Guide to Overcoming Traumatic Stress, by Don R. Catherall, Ph.D.
Table of Contents | Introduction | Afterword
Chapter 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
back to EmotionalSafety.net
previous | next
11
RESOLVING
DEEP‑SEATED
BLOCKS
Working Through, Reconnecting,
and Moving On
Some traumatized people have emotional blocks that prevent them from becoming involved with people on an intimate level, blocks that preceded the traumatization. And now those blocks are interfering with the recovery. If these blocks are a part of who you are, they can be among the toughest impediments to your recovery and you may need to see a therapist to deal with them.
You may find that your survivor guilt is
particularly difficult to shed. Survivor guilt is often seen among people
whose survival is, at most, only vaguely related to someone else's death. And
even if your survival was clearly related to another person's death, your guilt
feelings have likely been influenced by other psychological issues besides the
trauma.
People sometimes continue to have survivor guilt because
it gives an illusion of having control: you could have prevented the trauma if
you'd only done a certain thing. This attitude allows you to avoid the feelings
of extreme helplessness that are part of the trauma. For you, the alternative
to feeling guilty may be high anxiety.
If we are already carrying guilt around with us,
we're more likely to respond to situations by feeling guilty. And a propensity
to feel unwarranted guilt can cause considerable pain in our relationships.
Consequently, we either avoid relationships or remain defensive within them.
Feeling guilt for a brief time helps us make moral choices in life; feeling excessively
guilty hampers us and interferes with closeness.
People carry extra guilt for a variety of reasons.
Some people had parents or other significant adults who controlled them by
inducing guilt all the time. On top of feeling guilty, these people are usually
angry and likely to feel that others are playing upon their guilt feelings.
Other people feel excessive guilt for the opposite reason—they got away with
too much as children, felt they were taking advantage of their parents' good
nature, and developed a harsh attitude as a way of controlling themselves.
Children who are scared by the intensity of the terrible anger they feel at
parents and siblings often learn to control themselves by feeling guilty.
Traumatization can bring any of these old guilty tendencies to the surface. And
the more guilt you feel, the less you'll be able to engage in a trust
relationship.
Excessive guilt is often manifested in self‑blaming.
As you've seen, it's natural for you to question your behavior and
responsibility in the trauma. You go back over what happened hundreds of times
and think about what you might have done differently. But if you carried
excessive guilt before the trauma, the natural process of self‑examination
can turn into a destructive process of self‑blaming. You must forgive
yourself. If you think that what you've done is unforgivable, try talking with
someone who cares about you. You might be surprised to find that someone else
can understand and still accept you.
When Florence left her first husband to marry
Barney, she lost custody of her three children—two boys and a girl—in the
trial. There was a lot of animosity in the divorce, and the ex‑husband
subsequently made it very difficult for Florence to see her children. She was
so upset by her loss that she went into a severe depression. The divorce took
on a traumatic quality for Florence, and for years she was haunted by images of
the judge announcing his decision to award custody to her ex‑husband.
For several years, Florence had inconsistent,
erratic contacts with her children. When Barney got a career opportunity in
another city, they moved away. A year later, her middle child (and only
daughter) became ill and died a few weeks after being diagnosed. Florence had
not seen her before she died. After that, her ex‑husband relaxed his
hold a bit and started allowing the two boys to spend summers with Florence.
When each boy finished high school, he went to live with Florence.
In her divorce, Florence had expected to be hurt
financially, but she had never really considered the possibility that she
could lose the custody battle. Despite her poor legal counsel, Florence got
angry at no one but herself, and eventually Barney. She did not qualify for a
diagnosis of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, but she did have several of the
symptoms. She withdrew socially and, from that time on, thought of her life in
terms of before and after the divorce.
Then her daughter died. Florence subsequently became
extremely overprotective with the boys. She made herself their personal slave
whenever they were with her, and she and Barney frequently fought over Barney's
desire to discipline the boys. Florence even blamed Barney for taking her away
from her children because of his job‑though she blamed herself even more.
This theme underlay most of their fights.
Florence felt guilty about everything she'd done
that resulted in her losing her children. She felt responsible for her
daughter's death—even though she wouldn't have been able to change it had she
been there. Her daughter's death stimulated trauma symptoms, such as emotional
numbing, intrusive thoughts, sleep problems, and depression. Over time most of
these symptoms improved, but her guilt continued. She had felt guilty before
the child died, and the death only made her guilt heavier.
Only when Florence was able to share her feelings of
guilt with Barney did they stop fighting. He had always felt that she blamed
him, but when she talked about her own feelings of guilt, he saw that this was
not the case. Still, the end of their fighting didn't mean Florence stopped
feeling guilty. That only changed over time as Barney's consistent acceptance
helped her look at herself from a new perspective.
Here are some things you can think about if you're
suffering from excessive guilt:
·
Did
either of your parents ever express guilt? About what?
·
Did
you grow up in a judgmental atmosphere, where there was a rigid line between
good and bad?
·
Did
people in your family apologize? Were apologies viewed as expressions of concern
for others, or as a punishment for misbehavior?
·
How
quickly and sincerely were family members forgiven if they violated the family
rules?
·
Did
you learn to forgive others? (If not, you may find it hard to forgive
yourself.)
·
Did
you ever feel that other family members were trying to make you feel guilty in
order to get their way?
·
Did
you grow up feeling that it was all right to be who you are or that what you
are was not all right and that you must hide your innermost thoughts and
feelings?
The answers to these questions can help you build a
clearer picture of your background education and training in feeling guilty.
Changing this picture means developing new rules. It can be very hard to change
your family rules, but the first step is always identifying them. It's only
then that you can decide what kind of rules make sense for the world you live
in today. Here are some rules you might consider:
·
Accepting
responsibility for your own shortcomings should be applauded. This is a
positive step in dealing with those shortcomings. You should feel good that
you're dealing with them—not bad because you have them—and you should not use
them as an excuse.
·
The
only person who can make you feel guilty is yourself. You must take other
people's feelings into consideration, but ultimately you decide whether you're
letting yourself down.
·
An
apology is a way of repairing a hurt. You do it because you care about the
other person—not because someone must take the blame in order to stop the
conflict.
·
All
feelings are acceptable. No one should be blamed or judged for having feelings.
Guilt is like the seasoning in a meal. A little bit
makes everything better, but too much can ruin the food.
All trauma involves loss, whether it is an actual
physical loss or an intangible loss such as the illusions of security. If you
have a history of loss, then this can be a difficult issue for you. Many people
who experience painful losses learn to protect themselves from having it
happen again by trying to not get too attached to anything.
If your trauma was a major loss or if you have a
history of loss, you may now find it difficult to let yourself get fully
attached. You may play the game of fault‑finding and maintain a
defensive attitude toward the person with whom you're tempted to get close. You
pull away and find reasons not to care—but since you're human, you do care. So
you end up ambivalent, often attributing your own unhappiness to a fault in the
person with whom you're involved rather than to your own fear of experiencing
loss and hurt again.
Overcoming your fear of loss first means owning up
to it. Once you accept that you're dealing with feelings of loss, it may be a
little easier to see your aloofness as a way of staying away from those
feelings. Perhaps you did not sufficiently mourn those other losses, and your
current situation exacerbates feelings you already carried. But as you accept
your need to mourn past losses and face your sadness, you will be able to
invest in present relationships more easily.
Mourning loss is both a private and a shared
experience. In the final analysis, you mourn alone, and part of what makes
mourning so painful is the awareness of your basic aloneness. Yet
paradoxically, you can begin to work through your loss by sharing the
experience with others. Talking about a loss to a good listener can give words
to your feelings and help you to understand them better yourself. Rituals enable
you to communicate further with yourself and others and to crystallize feelings
that are difficult to put into words.
Sean
and Kelly suffered a traumatic loss and tried to live as if it didn't mean as
much as it did. Their baby boy lived only four weeks. The loss was terribly
traumatic for them, and they mourned for several months. Then they tried to resume
their old lives, but they found it wasn't so easy. They developed problems in
their marriage and argued a lot, and Sean started drinking heavily. Over the
next several years, they grew even farther apart, and they stopped discussing
when to have another baby. Sean became increasingly withdrawn, while Kelly
became absorbed in doing volunteer work at a children's home. Additionally,
Kelly began to take in every abandoned cat and dog that she came across and
became active in an organization that cared for unwanted pets.
When Sean and Kelly were encouraged by a therapist
to talk about the loss of "little Sean," they grew closer. They had
each lived with their grief alone, each harboring secret feelings of guilt and
blaming. Kelly was trying to be a successful mother to all the animals in town
as part of her way of dealing with her guilt and replacing her loss. Sean was
drowning his in the bottle. Even after these issues became clear, they
continued to need professional help to work out the problems. Sean's alcoholism
had become an independent problem and had to be treated. In addition, they both
needed to grieve their loss.
Here are some questions for you to consider:
·
What
kind of losses do you have in your background? Have you lost dreams and
opportunities as well as people?
·
How
was sadness treated in your family? Were all family members permitted to cry,
or were there rules against some members showing sadness?
·
How
could you tell when your mother was sad? How about your father? Do you see any
similarities with the way you behave now?
·
What
have you lost as the result of your traumatization?
And here are some things you
can do:
·
First
of all, talk with your loved ones about your losses.
·
Talk
about the losses from earlier in your life as well as the current ones.
·
Look
at the ways that you've denied your losses by pretending
that you didn't feel sad.
·
Perform
a ritual to help you acknowledge your loss. Get your loved ones involved in it.
·
View
yourself as in mourning, and give yourself time to feel your grief. Accept that
you may be depressed for a while, but that it is appropriate.
·
Say
good‑bye to those and that which you have lost.
Abandonment is related to loss—in fact, sometimes
they're the same thing. But not always: You can be abandoned without actually
losing the person. I'm talking about an emotional
abandonment. If you have a heightened sensitivity to abandonment, it's
likely you suffered either an important loss or an emotional disconnection
from some significant caretaker in your childhood. You consequently carry
feelings of insecurity now, and they increase when you find yourself becoming
attached to someone.
Traumatization frequently stirs up abandonment
issues, most obviously when there is a loss in the course of the trauma. But
the link can be less direct. The simple fact that a traumatization has occurred
can revive insecurities and fears that were formerly put to rest. Being
traumatized places you in a more dependent state, even though you may resist
it. And the more you feel you need other people, the more you're likely to
reexperience concerns you had in previous situations where you relied on
others.
As a child of eight, Irene was sent away to live
with relatives for reasons that were never entirely clear to her. She departed
under the impression that she would be returning to her parents' home within a
couple of weeks, but it was several months before she came back. During the
extended stay, she kept hearing that she would be going home shortly, but
various things kept delaying her return. Her younger brother was still home and
she talked to him and to her parents on the phone, always begging to be
brought home as soon as possible.
She eventually returned, and the extended nature of
her visit was never treated as a big issue. But as an adult, Irene developed
fears of traveling and was overly protective of her children. In effect,
neither she nor her family had ever acknowledged the traumatic effect that her
extended "trip" as a child had had on her. But it left her with fears
of being abandoned that were intense enough to influence her choice of husband
and her approach to raising her children. Only after she examined these fears
with a therapist did Irene begin to separate her childhood fears from the
realities of her adult life. She was able to stop being overprotective and
clingy with her children, and she became more comfortable with traveling.
If abandonment is an issue for you, the primary task
is for you and your loved ones to be aware
of your sensitivity to feelings of emotional abandonment. You should talk
about your past feelings of abandonment. The more aware of them you are, the
more you can separate the past from the present. Your loved ones can learn to
be sensitive to these feelings and make efforts not to cause you to feel
abandoned unnecessarily. But this means that you will have to speak up and let
them know if you're feeling abandoned.
As we saw in Chapter 10, rage is a common
consequence of traumatization. It is always difficult to deal with, but
sometimes it can be terribly persistent—particularly when the traumatization
uncovers rage from the past and unresolved issues from childhood.
Emmett was an upstanding citizen who was mistakenly
accused of being involved in a major crime. He spent nearly four months in the
county jail before the mistake was discovered and he was released. He was
enraged, particularly at the police detective responsible for the case. Emmett
had tried to explain to the detective that he couldn't have committed the
crime, and he felt that the detective had not listened to him. After his
incarceration, Emmett developed a number of symptoms of PTSD, including
intrusive memories and dreams, social withdrawal, sleep problems, and angry
outbursts. In the ensuing months, most of the symptoms improved, but Emmett
had difficulty controlling his temper. He got into angry confrontations with
the authority figures in his life, particularly his supervisors at work.
Emmett went to a therapist to get some help for his
problems, particularly his angry outbursts. As he explored his feelings, he
learned that the situation with the detective had revived feelings he had had
about his father when he was a child. His father, a rigid disciplinarian, had
beaten Emmett for minor infractions and had never listened to Emmett's side of
the story. Emmett always felt that his father was unfair, but he learned to
keep his anger to himself because it only led to more beatings. As an adult,
Emmett avoided his old feelings of being treated unfairly by becoming a model
citizen—until he was treated unfairly by the detective. Then Emmett lost trust
in all men in positions of authority.
A clue to the childhood origins of Emmett's rage was
what he said during confrontations with his supervisors: "You can't treat
me this way, you're not my father." In therapy, however, he came to see
the origins of this rage and developed the ability to separate that old anger
from his current situation.
Traumatization can cause you to revert to ways of
dealing with life and coping mechanisms from earlier stages of your life.
Psychologists call this phenomenon regression.
If, as a child, you had difficulty maintaining an independent identity,
you're at risk for developing similar problems following a traumatization. You
may have had an overly protective parent who didn't allow you to make
decisions or have independent feelings. Or perhaps your parent was too narcissistic
and needed to be the center of attention, unable to allow you to have your own
identity.
Parents aren't the only ones who contribute to such
difficulties. Children can become excessively dependent upon an adult when
they are lost in the shuffle of a large family or terribly outshined by a
remarkable sibling, leading them to form a less independent identity. If you
carry vestiges of such problems, traumatization can cause you to once more shy
away from getting involved with others for fear of losing your independent
sense of yourself.
Dale, who was traumatized by the abortion, is an
example of someone whose old difficulties with her sense of self were
uncovered by her traumatization. She had always lived her life for other
people: She was the reliable friend to whom others turned, expecting her to
take care of things. After her traumatic abortion, she developed a number of
conflicts with her husband Ed. She felt taken for granted, and she argued with
him that his needs always came first and that she was expected to be the one to
do all the accommodating. When she explored this issue in psychotherapy, she
found that she had always felt this way. Her family had placed much more
importance on her brother than on her. They had encouraged his education,
attended his athletic activities, and basically paid more attention to his
needs. She had dealt with this situation by becoming the uncomplaining daughter
and adoring sister, allowing her own interests to fade away.
Dale's traumatization brought these old issues to
the surface. She felt that Ed had wanted the abortion for purely selfish
reasons and that she'd gone along with it only to please him. This opened up a
feeling in her that their entire relationship was structured to please him and
facilitate his life. She just fit herself into the spaces he left her. As she
uncovered her feelings about her family, her anger at Ed abated. She realized
that she was most upset with herself for not taking more initiative in her life
or pursuing her interests. She decided that this had to change. She went back
to college and got the education that she'd always wanted. And as she took the
initiative to make things happen in her life, her feelings about herself
changed, and she no longer resented others for denying her opportunities.
If you're finding it difficult to maintain a strong
sense of who you are, or if you fear being swallowed up by the other person in
a relationship, the sanctity of a therapeutic relationship could help. I would
recommend that you go into psychotherapy, especially if you don't have a good
trust relationship. A professional therapist will protect your confidentiality
and do everything possible to preserve your identity and sense of self.
One of the primary feelings that surfaces as a result of traumatization is helplessness. It's natural for anyone to try to avoid feeling helpless. And even if you grew up with more than your share of helpless feelings, you may have learned to cope by exerting control. We all use control to some extent. But some people become more strongly oriented than others toward controlling other people.
Manipulating and controlling produce different
feelings on the part of the person being manipulated or controlled. Both kinds
of behavior can make the person angry, but there are differences underneath
that anger. When we've been manipulated, we feel tricked, and we tend to view the manipulator as dishonest or
insincere. When we're controlled by someone else, however, we feel helpless, and we tend to view the
controlling person as cold and uncaring. The manipulative person is trying to
get something for himself, while the controlling person just needs to be in
control in order to feel in control himself.
If you have control problems, you probably grew up
in an environment that was chaotic or that contained someone who tried to
control you excessively. You learned to cope with your environment by taking
control yourself. Ironically, an overly controlling caretaker perpetuates the
phenomenon by turning the child into yet another controlling parent.
Andrew had frequent battles over control with his
wife, Lindy. The content of the conflicts often seemed much less important than
Andrew's need to continually assert his control. He felt that Lindy couldn't
be trusted to take care of things; he oversaw and double‑checked
everything she did. He was intellectual and practical, while she was fairly emotional.
When they would get into an argument, he would come on very strong and insist
that his point of view was the correct one. Lindy learned to back off, though
she continued to resent his behavior. Andrew could not tolerate Lindy's
emotionalism and would criticize her. As a result, Lindy felt controlled, and
she said their conflicts made her feel as if he had "rolled over her with
a steamroller."
When Andrew explored the issue of control in
therapy, several things turned up in his past that helped explain his style. He
had served in the air force in Vietnam and had been exposed to several rocket
attacks at his base. He had shared a shelter with a group of men, and one
particularly scared individual used to get the whole group spooked. Lindy's
emotional arguments seemed threatening to him in the same way.
Further exploration revealed another emotional situation
in Andrew's childhood. His father had left the family when Andrew was less than
a year old, and his mother had focused all her attention on Andrew. He and his
mother were very close for years, but he eventually came to feel suffocated by
her excessive involvement with him. She tried to make all his decisions and
told him what he was feeling. In order to fend her off, Andrew became
controlling and intellectual the same way he responded to the hysterical airman
and his wife. He needed to control them because their emotional upheavals were
too unsettling for him and left him feeling out of control.
If the trauma involves a physical threat, physical safety becomes a concern. Even a trauma that doesn't involve a physical threat can stir up safety issues from the past. If a trauma experienced in adulthood is severe enough, it can bring back the insecurity and fearfulness that you experienced in childhood.
In most of the examples in this chapter, an adult's
traumatization has revived issues from earlier in life. But a trauma need not
revive earlier issues to have a severe impact. Sometimes the nature of a
particular traumatization is overpowering, and sometimes the recovery process
is not allowed to take place. Penny was traumatized in her early twenties and,
twenty years later, developed problems related to her inability to feel safe.
There don't appear to have been any situations from her childhood that caused
her to react this way. Rather, the trauma she experienced was so severe that
her ability to feel safe at all was terribly mangled. Moreover, she had no
opportunity to discuss and process the trauma.
Penny, as an independent and strong‑willed
girl, did well in school, was active in extracurricular activities, and was
popular with her peers. She pursued activities—such as rock‑climbing and
sky‑diving—that most people avoided. She learned to test her limits by
trying new things and developed an attitude of competence and confidence in
her own ability to deal with difficult situations. But after a traumatic
incident in her second year of living on her own, this changed.
Penny became involved with a young man named David.
He was close to his family and quite serious about the relationship with
Penny. But some of David's traits bothered Penny, and she decided to break up
with him. After the breakup, he called her repeatedly and pleaded with her to
reconsider, and when she refused, he would often end the conversation with
angry threats. One day, he convinced her to come by his place and pick up some
things of hers that were still there. He told her he had accepted the breakup
and was no longer angry. When she got there, he raped her, beat her up, and
kept her in a room for approximately twenty hours. When his parents showed up
unexpectedly, David was discovered, and they released Penny, treated her wounds
and bruises, and pleaded with her not to tell anyone about the incident. They
said that David was mentally disturbed and they were getting treatment for him
and that he would be put away if the story were known.
Penny's traumatized condition made her particularly
agreeable to doing as David's parents asked. After all, they had just saved
her, treated her gently, and taken care of her. And she had always viewed
herself as able to deal with very difficult situations without calling for
help. So she agreed to protect David and keep the incident a secret. For many
years she didn't talk about what had happened. But she was no longer the
carefree, exuberant risk‑taker that she'd been. She lived a quieter life,
withdrew from her positions of high visibility, and adopted a blander image.
She changed how she dressed, the kind of glasses she wore, how she wore her
hair, and what she did with her free time. And she tried to forget those twenty
hours during which she had feared being killed every moment.
Twenty years later, Penny married Charles, a
reliable, even‑tempered man who made her feel safe. Like Penny, Charles
was familiar with all kinds of sports and adventurous activities, and they
shared many interests. He had two grown children, a son and a daughter, who
lived in another state. When Penny and Charles were around the son (whose name
was also David), Penny felt that the young man was being disrespectful toward
her. Some of his remarks even seemed hostile, and she asked Charles to speak to
him. Charles felt she was overreacting and suggested she let it go. Over a
period of several years, this pattern was repeated, and Penny's anxiety grew
each time. She came to dread encounters with the son and was angry at Charles
for minimizing her feelings and refusing to take her seriously.
Penny and Charles sought counseling for their
marital problems. The most frequent dispute centered on Penny's anger that
Charles would not reproach David.
As the intensity of Penny's feelings became clear to
him, Charles began to realize that he had been unempathic to Penny. He accepted
his responsibility to protect her and took a much firmer stance with his son.
Only then was Penny able to unburden herself somewhat by talking about her
trauma in therapy, and she processed it further by talking privately with
Charles. Finally, they both discussed the situation with David, including
Penny's traumatization. David apologized to Penny and became more sensitive in
his dealings with her. Penny was still not the carefree risk-taker she'd once
been, but she found it easier to face fearful situations in her current life.
This chapter has focused on several kinds of issues
that can be stirred up by traumatization. Many of them relate to the
individual's personality and his or her approach to coping with life. These
issues are representative of the kind of things that traumatized individuals
often continue to work on after they've begun processing the primary trauma
itself. There are certainly more issues than these, and every person's story
is unique, but these are common ones.
Not only do these preexisting issues make recovery
very difficult for trauma survivors, they also make life very difficult for
the loved ones of trauma survivors. As a loved one, you're limited in what you
can do because, to some degree, these issues themselves interfere with your
attempts to explore them. If you try to talk with the trauma survivor about
his guilt, you run the risk that he will experience you as blaming. Probing unresolved
losses can provoke powerful reactions. The person who is sensitive to
abandonment may feel abandoned every time she pushes you away. Trying to talk
to your loved one about his rage is always risky. And it's easy to come on too
strong with someone whose sense of self has been damaged. Trying to approach
the issue of control with a controlling person is easily experienced as an
attack and can turn into a control battle. And the underlying terror in the
person who can't feel safe makes her distrustful.
So what can you do? The essence of what you can do
comes back to what I've been stressing throughout the book. Develop a trust relationship. Talk about the
feelings between you so that the air
remains clear. You will only be able to discuss these and other difficult
issues if you trust each other.
These issues are often resolved in psychotherapy. If
you are the trauma survivor, you must decide whether to pursue psychotherapy.
Your decision will depend upon the severity of your problem, the degree of your
motivation, and the extent of your resources. But therapy can be tremendously
helpful for the problems discussed in this chapter. The last chapter of this
book will take you on a quick tour of the terrain of psychotherapy so that you
may approach it with some degree of knowledge.