Back From the Brink: A Family Guide to Overcoming Traumatic Stress, by Don R. Catherall, Ph.D.
Table of Contents | Introduction | Afterword
Chapter 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12
back to EmotionalSafety.net
previous | next
5
GUIDELINES
FOR THE
TRAUMA
SURVIVOR
This
chapter is for those who are actually trauma survivors. Whether you know it or
not, you're already doing things to cope with your suffering. You're coping
with daily stress, and with the symptoms and problems that your traumatization
has produced. The things you're doing may be helping but not enough; worse yet,
some of the ways you're coping may be producing additional problems.
A stressor is something that produces stress. It may be the traffic on the freeway, friction with your boss, or the intrusive memory of a trauma. All of these produce stress, some more than others. When you encounter a minor or major stressor, you put your coping mechanisms to work. If it's a major stressor, you likely put more of them to work, including those you don't often use in dealing with the minor stressors. We all have those coping mechanisms that we rely upon regularly, and we have others that we maintain in reserve for major stressful events, such as the loss of a loved one.
Many of the coping mechanisms you use for minor
stressors in your daily life are limited in their power. They are not adequate
for major stressors, providing short‑term help at best. You get into
trouble if you try to stretch some of these minor strategies to fit situations
that are too much for them. These daily mechanisms are very important, to be
sure—they're the foundation of your coping style, and they reflect your basic
attitude about how you view and deal with stressful events. Some people
confront stressors, while others avoid them. You probably do some of both, but
if you always avoid daily stressors, you'll be at a disadvantage in dealing
with major stressors.
At
this point, stop and take the time to assess your own coping style. Write down
a few sentences that describe your approach to dealing with stressors, both
major and minor. Here are some questions to consider:
·
What
are your predominant attitudes about daily stress? Is it best to confront it or
avoid it?
·
What
kinds of things have you done in the past to deal with major stressors? Have
you ever numbed out? If so, how much? Have you ever been a sensation or arousal
seeker, or put yourself in situations that recreate your trauma? Again, how
often? Have you ever pursued a program of self discipline? If so, how far did
it go? Was it useful?
·
How
much have you effectively used recreation, relaxation, or exercise to deal with
stress?
Your coping style is strongly influenced by your
family background. Stop and think about it—what's your family's coping style?
Here are some more questions to consider:
·
Do
you come from a family that encourages ignoring daily stresses? Or does your
family help you recognize and anticipate life's problems? Do they accept
problems as challenges?
·
Is
it acceptable to talk about problems in your family, even little ones? Or is it
frowned upon and viewed as whining or feeling sorry for yourself?
·
Think
back to your family's unwritten rules about expressing emotion. Is it really permitted to get upset about something that happens to you?
·
How
does your personal coping style mesh with your family's unwritten rules?
·
Are
you still following the same rules you grew up with, or have you reacted
against some rules by trying to live very differently?
There are as many ways of coping with daily‑life
stress as there are kinds of people. But there are some common patterns, and
you're likely to approach traumatic stress in one of these ways. Here are some
of the common attitudes people adopt toward daily stress.
One of the most common ways of dealing with stress is to do nothing whatsoever. Act as if it doesn't bother you, and the theory is that it won't. This is the John Wayne approach, strong and silent. You probably use this coping mechanism sometimes since the best way to deal with many of life's minor stressors is, in fact, to ignore them. But pretending that a major stressor doesn't bother you generally doesn't work—major stressors are hard to ignore. Ignoring them (stoicism) can block the all‑important processing that is needed in the case of trauma.
Another coping mechanism that you probably use is to
try to forget what happened. Sometimes people are able to leave traumas behind
them. Even in major traumas, most people have a healthy tendency to forget
things that are too disturbing, such as the grisly details. Over time, you're
able to forget many aspects of a major trauma. You generally don't forget that
it happened, but you're often able to forget many of the little memory cues
that bring back the worst of it.
Some people regard life's stresses as a challenge
and respond to them by becoming aggressive and competitive. This is a way of
dealing with the trauma directly, rather
than avoiding it by ignoring or forgetting it. Football players sneer at and
ignore stressors when they overcome minor injuries and go back on the field to
win. The spirit behind this attitude can get you through many a jam, but you
need more than this to deal with a serious trauma.
A sense of humor is one of the blessings we've been
given to deal with the frustrations and disappointments of life. It plays a
part in helping us change our perspective and reduce the sting of events. It's
one of the very best coping mechanisms you can have, but it's still only one of
a number of mechanisms that you need in order to deal with a major trauma.
Many people cope with daily stress by talking about
it and sharing their feelings about it with others. This serves to decrease the
pressure they're under and provides the opportunity for a change of
perspective. Talking about stress is a mainstay coping strategy; you can use it
with the smallest stressors and the major ones. It's primarily through talking
that you examine and change your perspective. It's also through talking that
you express your feelings and, in the process, come to understand them more
clearly yourself. Through talking with someone you trust and care about, you
can process and ultimately come to terms with traumatization.
These basic attitudes about daily stress influence how a person will approach major forms of stress. In general, people need more powerful, long‑term coping mechanisms when they are dealing with major stressors, particularly when they've been traumatized. The following are some mechanisms that people commonly use to deal with a trauma.
Most people numb out their emotions and stop feeling them at some point in dealing with traumatic stress. But doing this creates a host of other problems. Since numbing out is difficult for some people, they may resort to drugs and alcohol to help them numb out. Once you've numbed out sufficiently, you carry an emotional deadness inside; then you resort to further problematic mechanisms to overcome the deadness.
It is sometimes adaptive to be able to numb out, and
people who function at a high level in crisis situations are usually good at
numbing. But it becomes a major symptom of PTSD if it goes too far.
Sharon was an emergency‑room nurse who overdid
her emotional numbing. When she started ER work, she learned to maintain
emotional distance in dealing with trauma victims. Sometimes she and the other
ER staff would even gather in the staff lounge and make fun of the misery of
the traumatized patients. Sharon initially found this to be cruel, and she held
back during the joking. But after a while, it didn't seem so bad to her, and
she found she was comfortable with it even though she still cared deeply about
the people she treated.
Then Sharon's hospital was elevated in the trauma
network of major hospitals in her city. The hospital nearest hers closed down
its trauma services, and suddenly Sharon's ER was barraged with additional
patients, including many victims of violent crime from a part of town that the
other hospital had previously served. Her job changed its character. Every
shift was enormously draining; everyone felt overworked. For Sharon, it meant
exposure to many more, very severe injuries.
Sharon found that the depth of her feeling for the
patients became shallower. She became hardened, and the humor in the lounge
was no longer funny—there was a bite to it that hadn't been there before.
Sharon and many of her colleagues had become emotionally numb, and she even
developed a drinking problem. A therapist recognized that she'd been
traumatized and helped her stop drinking. Sharon then transferred to a
different section of the hospital and recovered her emotional spontaneity.
Sensation‑seeking is a means of coping with
the deadness that comes from excessive numbing out. Sensation seekers and
"adrenaline junkies" pursue high‑risk activities to give
themselves a jolt to overcome their lack of feeling. They may work in high‑risk
professions, have high‑risk hobbies, or lead dangerous lives. We all
enjoy some occasional excitement in our lives, but sensation‑seekers'
lives center on getting that excitement. Without it, they feel empty and depressed.
The following example of a sensation‑seeker may seem exaggerated, but
there are a surprising number of trauma survivors who live just like this man.
Sam was traumatized in Vietnam. He was in bitter
fighting and faced death a number of times. Back in the States, he became a
policeman. He always managed to be involved in the more severe incidents, and
he fought with several desperate criminals. In his off‑duty hours, he
rode a motorcycle, drank heavily, and often got into fights at bars, usually
with much bigger opponents. His hobbies were whitewater kayaking, rock
climbing, and sky‑diving. Seldom did a week go by when Sam didn't have a
major adrenaline rush over something, much as he had during his perilous tour
of combat duty. The risk‑taking nature of Sam's sensation‑seeking
may represent more than just an effort to overcome inner deadness. Many
sensation‑seekers also have survivor guilt (see page 55) and are testing
their fate and punishing themselves.
Arousal‑seeking includes not only sensation‑seeking
but less risky activities as well. Arousal‑seekers work to keep
themselves on an adrenaline high. Some work at an intense job, while others
resort to drug use, sexual addiction, and fighting. They use the arousing
quality of these experiences either to keep themselves from feeling deadness
inside or to find outlets for the state of hyperarousal that their traumatization
has produced.
Marian, who was physically and sexually abused by
her mother's boyfriends and a stepfather, grew up feeling deadened inside. As
an adolescent, she used every drug that came along and became particularly fond
of amphetamines, which gave her a feeling of being very up and intense. As an
adult, she relinquished most of her drug use, but became obsessed with sex and
slept with several men each week. She couldn't tolerate sitting around her home
and went out virtually every night. She eventually got control of her sexual
behavior but became deeply involved with her career, working long days and
taking little time to herself. One way or another, this arousal‑seeker
always kept herself going at a high pitch.
Many people stave off the effects of traumatization
by undergoing a self‑imposed program that requires high levels of self‑discipline.
It may be an exercise program, a work project, or an intensely preoccupying
hobby. When Marian went from purely arousing activities to an intense
investment in her work, it allowed her to focus her high level of energy, but
she was still burning herself up. There's a fine line between a healthy
program of self‑discipline and an obsession that runs your life.
Chris grew up in a violent, alcoholic family. Her
father beat her when she disobeyed or challenged him about his drinking. She
also saw him beat her mother several times. She never felt protected in her
family. Chris coped by becoming highly involved in athletics at school. She
was quite driven in her devotion to practice and became an accomplished
gymnast, which eventually earned her a scholarship. After college she moved
away from her family. But she continued to pursue athletic activities to such
a degree that it created new problems. When she damaged her knees by running
enormous distances each week, she switched to swimming and tennis. When she
gained weight in her late twenties, she became obsessed with her diet and
nearly starved herself. She eventually went to a program for eating disorders
and learned to be less rigid in her pursuit of programs that were supposed to
make her feel better.
Some people work to overcome the effects of traumatization by exposing themselves to the trauma repeatedly until it loses its power over them. They may be so intent on doing this that they go out of their way to recreate and relive the trauma. Whenever they encounter a situation that reminds them of the trauma, they feel compelled to enter the situation and master the feelings it evokes.
Emma's father drank and beat his wife and children.
She left home when she was eighteen years old by running away with a boy and
getting married. The marriage lasted less than two years; after that, Emma
became involved in two different relationships with men who battered her. She
left each of the men and went to live elsewhere several times, but she
invariably returned to the men who mistreated her. She felt she could help
these men overcome their tendency to beat her by becoming more accepting and
understanding of them. Only after she realized she was still trying to change
her abusive father was she able to feel appropriately frightened, leave these
abusive men, and get involved with a non-abusive man.
Dealing with the Meaning of Your
Trauma
These mechanisms are some common ways people deal
with the disturbing emotions stirred up by their traumatization. You probably
recognize some of them yourself. But ultimately, you must deal with the meaning of your traumatization. Only
then will you come to terms with it and be able to live with it. Here are some
of the ways you can make sense of what's happened to you.
We often overcome our upset at one of life's
obstacles by telling ourselves that it's not such a big thing. This coping
mechanism is reflected in the aphorism, "I cried because I had no shoes,
until I saw a man who had no feet." By changing your perspective on the
severity of the trauma, you change its meaning and therefore diminish its power
over you.
While Judy was looking for work in the field of modeling, she was involved in an automobile accident that resulted in a nasty scar on her face. Naturally, she felt her life was ruined. She became depressed and bitter and lost her motivation, saying that this was God's way of telling her that she was too vain and that now she would be forced to know what it felt like to be ugly and to envy the beautiful people. Judy's family talked her into getting plastic surgery. She had two operations, and both times she criticized the results. Although the surgeries brought some improvement, they didn't make the scar invisible.
One day, one of Judy's old high school girlfriends
talked her into helping out at the day‑care center where she worked. Judy
discovered she enjoyed working with children, perhaps in part because some of
them openly asked about her scar but didn't seem to be put off by it. Her
interest grew, and she eventually sought a degree in early childhood education.
She had found a goal that gave her life meaning once more.
Today, Judy is happy; she isn't obsessed with her
scar or what happened to her. She no longer feels that the accident was meant
to teach her anything. She still wishes that it had never happened but adds
that it may have been a blessing in disguise. Although when it first happened,
she felt she was ugly, now she doesn't think so. She looks in the mirror and
sees herself, not her scar. And the blessing is that now this is how she looks
at other people too. In coming to terms with her traumatization, Judy's
perspective has changed, and she has grown.
You can work on changing your perspective by doing
the following:
·
Talk
to someone you trust. Is there anyone you can talk to who has been through a
similar experience? Whoever you talk to, let them know how you feel, how you
view what's happened to you.
·
If
there's no one with whom you can talk about these things, find a good
therapist. (See Chapter 12 for guidelines).
·
Verbalize
the questions that are plaguing you. See what answers others might have for
those questions. Their answers don't have to be your answers, but they may
bring you a new perspective.
·
Tell
the people you trust about your losses. Accept their support. Don't pretend
that it doesn't matter.
·
Explore
the ways you've changed. Who were you before? Who are you now? What are the
things that make you feel good about yourself? What makes you feel bad about
yourself?
·
See
if you can describe your worldview. Take some time and spell it out in detail.
How has it changed from what it was before?
·
What
have you learned from your traumatization? What would you now want to teach your
children of your experience?
·
What
benefits? What do you have now that you didn't have before?
One common result of traumatization is that people's
belief systems change. Existing beliefs become stronger, or new beliefs may
replace old ones. This can give you greater strength to cope with both the
primary and relational traumas.
Many people find religion as a result of being
traumatized; of course this is not the only way a person might change his
beliefs. Traumatization causes you to ask questions—about yourself, your life,
even the meaning of existence. You need solid answers when you've been traumatized,
not superficial ones. You may come up with the same answers you had before, but
they're probably more deeply thought out. Or you may have to find answers to
questions you really hadn't considered before.
Beliefs are often strengthened when a person is
recovering from shattered illusions and is consciously reexamining his or her
most basic beliefs. It's not so much a coping strategy as a by‑product
of the process of examination. But as beliefs strengthen, they contribute to a
person's emotional equilibrium as well as his intellectual stability.
Harriet was eighteen years old when her father lost
his temper and became violent in an argument with her mother. He struck her
mother with a heavy object and killed her. Harriet hadn't known him to be a
particularly violent man, though his temper had always been very hot. When it
happened, she was away at her first semester of college, so she didn't directly
witness the violence. But the trauma for Harriet was the sudden loss of her
mother and the knowledge that her father had done this horrible thing. Her life
was turned upside down. She dropped out of school and went to live with some of
her mother's close relatives. Just about everyone she encountered viewed her
father as evil and discouraged her from seeing him at all. But it was not so
simple for Harriet. He was still her father, and now he was the only parent she
had.
After eight months, she decided that she needed to
visit her father. Several years later, she continues to visit him in prison.
Her feelings about him have been all over the map, but she refuses to write him
out of her life entirely. She was uncertain about this for some time, but
finally she came to believe there was something worthwhile and redeemable about
him. She seems to have found some answers to her question about how he could
have done what he did to her mother. She realized that he'd always had the
potential to do such a thing but that she'd simply made herself believe that it
wasn't so. Now her naiveté is gone, but her belief about her father's
underlying worth survives. Harriet's beliefs about people in general will never
be the same, but she feels she has a grasp of human nature that better prepares
her for the worst, yet still lets her enjoy the good in others.
Many people handle a major traumatization by devoting their lives to a cause, usually one related to the trauma. Organizations such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving are formed by trauma survivors or their loved ones (who are also trauma survivors). Many former addicts devote their lives to helping other addicts kick their habit. And survivors build memorials, such as the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, in hope of helping other survivors. All these groups give meaning to their lives by helping others. Many traumatized people become crusaders in order to bring meaning into a life that might otherwise feel meaningless. But organized causes are only the more obvious examples—there are also causes that aren't as obvious. Here's an example of someone finding a cause as a way of bringing meaning to her traumatization.
Angela, a clinical psychologist who specializes in
"women's issues," is very concerned with "giving women their
power," helping those women who've been abused physically or emotionally
by others, particularly men. She knows that her desire to help the underpowered
women in the world stems in large part from her own abuse as a child. She
doesn't want anyone else to have to live through what she's experienced. She's
given her life meaning by helping others avoid the trauma she endured. In a
sense, this allows her to attribute a positive meaning to her own abuse because
of the good it's enabled her to do for others.
No one coping style works for everyone. You must
start from the kind of coping style you already have and think about ways to
improve upon it. Finding causes and deep beliefs is not for everyone, but
everyone does need to change their
perspective. You must take the time to think about what you believe in and what
gives your life meaning. You'll probably find that it helps to have someone
with whom you can talk about these things—just thinking about them isn't so
easy. When I was a freshman at Texas A&M, we weren't permitted to
"think" about things; we were told we could only
"cogitate." Cogitating means to take careful and leisurely thought,
to meditate or ponder, to consider intently. I suggest you
"cogitate" about the meaning of your life. Here are some tough
questions for you to ponder:
·
What
are the most important things in your life? Are they things that you already
have or do, or are they things that you're striving to attain? If you're not
striving for them, why not?
·
What
are your priorities?
·
Do
you feel there is a spiritual dimension to life? Are your spiritual needs being
met?
·
Who
are the most important people in your life? Have they always been, or have the
important people changed over time?
·
What
are your personal strengths? What about your weaknesses? Have these changed? If
so, what strengths have you lost? Are there things you can do to get them back?
·
How
do you think you're seen by others? What do they admire about you? What do they
see as your weaknesses? How would you like to be viewed by others?
·
Who
do you consider to be people who are living their lives meaningfully? What
prevents you from living your life more like them?
·
Is
there a purpose to life, to suffering, to loss? How do you account for the
existence of terrible things, such as the trauma that you've suffered?
·
How
do you feel about yourself? Are you the kind of person you want to be?
·
Where
do you fit in your view of the world? Are you making a contribution?
It can be helpful to project yourself into the
future in order to obtain a better perspective on the present. Here are some questions that you can
consider:
·
When
you think about the latter stages of your life, what do you hope to be doing,
to have done? What kind of person do you hope to be?
·
Imagine
yourself at the end of your life. Now look back and think about your trauma
response. How did it change your life? What more positive place could that
change have led to? How might your trauma response have evolved, both in a more
positive direction and a more negative direction?
As you evaluate yourself and your use of coping
mechanisms, you will develop a picture of how you're dealing with your
traumatization. You may feel that you're dealing with the symptoms part of the
trauma response, but not moving forward with the healing because your
perspective has not changed and life feels meaningless. If so, you must closely
examine your coping mechanisms. These are what you have the greatest control
over! Ask yourself whether you're coping in a manner that allows you to process the trauma—or only contain it.
What exactly is processing the trauma? Processing is an internal experience in
which you examine and reflect upon your feelings, attitudes, and beliefs. It's
the process of change. It's usually accompanied by conversation, but the
processing shouldn't be confused with the conversation.
It's in your feelings that processing takes place.
You continually process feeling states. When your interests or tastes change,
you've processed some feelings. Some feelings are much stronger than others,
loaded with emotion and hard to change. Feelings related to your traumatization
are very strong. But even strong feelings change. The strength of the emotion
underlying most feelings fades over time—and facing fears can help diminish
their strength.
So look at your coping style and decide whether it's
allowing you to process your traumatization. If not, what needs to change?
As you alter your patterns of coping in order to
facilitate your processing, two things need to happen. First, you must find the
time and opportunity to delve within and find answers for the questions your
traumatization has created. Second, you must reach out and make better contact
with your world and the people who populate it. These two events weave around
and through one another—often you delve within by reaching out and talking to
someone about your inner feelings, beliefs, and attitudes. It's hard to simply
talk about feelings, beliefs, and attitudes; you discover those parts of
yourself through talking and thinking about events
in your life.
It's important that you and your loved ones have similar attitudes about the necessity of talking. If you don't, then trying to talk will create new tensions. Don't be too quick to assume that you know what your loved ones' attitudes are, much less your own. Just because no one has been talking doesn't mean that no one wants to. Many families remain silent because each member thinks that this is what everyone else wants. Your first step may be to ask your loved ones how they feel about the whole idea of talking.
The events you need to talk about may be the primary
trauma or other aspects of your life that provoke strong feelings. Some people
will need to talk explicitly about the trauma. Others will find that they and
their loved ones communicate in other ways and don't feel it's necessary to
talk about the trauma per se. You may or may not feel it's necessary to talk
about the frightening details of your trauma, but even if you do, not everyone
has to know them. What is more important is that they understand what you're upset about. As long as you
feel understood, you've made the connection you need to process your trauma. If
you don't feel understood, speak up. That's where the work begins.